TheDuke wrote:Do you have any thoughts on a game plan? Besides what is in the papers or on other boards.
Doesn't look like it?
You're right, I don't have any technical/playbook ideas for a game plan. But, then again, I didn't see "game plan" in the title of this thread, so I didn't feel bound to limit my comments to such issues, if I ever feel limited by such bounds in the first place.
I actually consider it silly to do armchair qb'ing/coordinating on the internet. In my mind, that's the coaches' responsibility. They're the one's getting paid for, and working full time at the job. They have access to the film, the tendency breakdowns, the inside scoops on what's going on with their players, and the eyes on the practice field about what is and isn't possible. That being said, I also consider them, for many but not all of those reasons, fully accountable for whatever happens on the field.
Seems to me that if the coaches are doing their jobs AND you are right in your analysis, then we will see your analysis come to fruition on the field against SC. Yet, THAT being said, somehow I doubt we will see ALL of your analysis come to fruition on the field. Obviously, that would mean either you are not right, or the coaches are not doing their jobs. Take your pick.
Then again maybe you've hit directly and spot on on head, in which case,
Also, in which case, I'm sure Monte and Lane Kiffin have been staying up late the past two nights dissecting your post.
p.s. Although, don't get me wrong, I don't dispute in any way your right to post what you think the game plan should be. I wouldn't question that right or even the particulars of it. But, when you post something like that, I'd assume you would be prepared for a variety of responses, including posts that don't reflect unconditional admiration and agreement.