TemeculaWarrior wrote:May that never ever happen!!!!H20 wrote:...Now if Mac brought back the Rainbows, THAT would have been a Rebirth.
TW
+1 million.
TemeculaWarrior wrote:May that never ever happen!!!!H20 wrote:...Now if Mac brought back the Rainbows, THAT would have been a Rebirth.
TW
You guys just burst Wyokie's bubblebigislandkurt wrote:TemeculaWarrior wrote:May that never ever happen!!!!H20 wrote:...Now if Mac brought back the Rainbows, THAT would have been a Rebirth.
TW
+1 million.
Stupidest thing JG and JJ did while here...2ScoopRice wrote:That's how I remember it.managerr wrote:I always thought that it was Jerry Glanville who started the "not everyone gets to dress" thing. Basically I thought that he thought the sidelines were too crowded and chaotic and had a hard time finding people...
I actually thought it was a lot. Has the NCAA changed it's policy on how many can suit up on gameday? I mean if Notre Dame had let everyone suit up at home there would have never been a Rudy story.BigWave96744 wrote: Please tell me what other college does this at home games...
Not that I know of...H20 wrote:Has the NCAA changed it's policy on how many can suit up on gameday?BigWave96744 wrote: Please tell me what other college does this at home games...
I DOUBT that Notre Dame does this to their scholarship playersH20 wrote:I mean if Notre Dame had let everyone suit up at home there would have never been a Rudy story.BigWave96744 wrote: Please tell me what other college does this at home games...
Yup..H20 wrote:Yeah thats a bit much. But by what Mac said today I think the team as a whole should feel less like they wont get a shot behind the seemingly untouchable coaches favorite rockstar starters we've heard about over the years. If he doesn't change the policy I'm sure he'll still find a way to make those guys feel as if they're still crucial to the team.
It was Glanville's idea and the policy continued after Glanville left. Boosters are not allowed in the team area, they are in the areas between the 20 yard line and the endzones. At the Sugar Bowl there were non-redshirt players that were not not dressed.thekiddd wrote:I think the not dressing/sit in the stands rule came from the athletic department. They wanted to keep sideline clutter down. But it seemed to me that they wanted to let more booster type people on the field.
At the Sugar Bowl, it only seemed like the redshirt players weren't in pads. They were the guys standing on the benches behind the team for most of the game.
i'm curious if that had anything to do with travel cost? taking full pads for all players would incur more cargo cost or something no? and doesn't hawaii have a self-imposed travel roster limit of 65 players or something (or what is 85) for road games? sugar bowl was the exception and all players were taken...BigWave96744 wrote:Not that I know of...H20 wrote:Has the NCAA changed it's policy on how many can suit up on gameday?BigWave96744 wrote: Please tell me what other college does this at home games...
There may be a number you can have on your "Active" Roster
When Hawaii played USC, there was way more USC players than Hawaii.
In the Sugar Bowl, Georgia suited up EVERY player in FULL pads.
Hawaii took up around 120 players. I think only 65 suited up in full pads
They all wore full pads in practice...808havok wrote:i'm curious if that had anything to do with travel cost? taking full pads for all players would incur more cargo cost or something no? and doesn't hawaii have a self-imposed travel roster limit of 65 players or something (or what is 85) for road games? sugar bowl was the exception and all players were taken...
maybe i'm just weird but if i was a player who don't stand a chance to get on the field, putting on full pads and not playing is like getting fully dressed for the school dance and not a single girl asking you to dance...
but like i said earlier, if that boosts morale for the team, i'm all for it...
then i guess i'll stop playin devil's advocate... haha. that doesn't make any sense then now does it? full gear during practice but not during the game? hrm...BigWave96744 wrote:They all wore full pads in practice...808havok wrote:i'm curious if that had anything to do with travel cost? taking full pads for all players would incur more cargo cost or something no? and doesn't hawaii have a self-imposed travel roster limit of 65 players or something (or what is 85) for road games? sugar bowl was the exception and all players were taken...
maybe i'm just weird but if i was a player who don't stand a chance to get on the field, putting on full pads and not playing is like getting fully dressed for the school dance and not a single girl asking you to dance...
but like i said earlier, if that boosts morale for the team, i'm all for it...
They all had the Sugar Bowl Jerseys.