poidog wrote:CoconutKid wrote:With regard to the difficulty of turning the athletic program around in Hawaii, there was not a single comment he said that wasn't true.
Yes, but is any of that news to anyone? My issue is that these boys from Ohio automatically equate "difficult" and "different", almost as if to say that if it can't be done like it's done at Ohio State, then it can't be done at all. I really think that's where the failure lies and that's why I hope they don't go with another search firm to find the next AD.
"For all the whining and complaining, none of this noise was as loud as it is now when the football team was winning and fun to watch. If the team was 8-5 and playing in the Hawaii Bowl, we aren't even having this conversation. People don't think about that..."
Smith, of Ohio State, said,
""I just know that if (Hawaii) is not the toughest job in college sports it is awfully close."
"Hawaii has got some problems, so to expect that you are going to hire somebody and they are going to walk in and all of a sudden your $3 million deficit is going to go away when, frankly, you have some systemic problems in your model, well, that's just not going to happen.
"When you have the stadium issues that you have, when you have the travel costs that you have and you want to be able to compete, there is a reality to those issues," Smith said. "When I look at the job, frankly, it is not just the AD. They have to understand that, hey, wait a minute, we need to rethink this model on how we fund Hawaii."
What IS news to me is you're interpretation of his comments. There is absolutely NOTHING in his statements that show any belief that "if it can't be done like it's done at Ohio State, then it can't be done at all.". Nothing. If anything, his comments reveal his belief that some of the problem are unique to Hawaii. Some of the issues he brings up are issues Dave Reardon and Ferd Lewis ALWAYS bring up. The only difference, an individual from Ohio said it. Not a local writer.