UnBiasFan wrote:Our offense needs very little adjustments.
I expect 5 touchdowns against Nevada.
R u serious?
UnBiasFan wrote:Our offense needs very little adjustments.
I expect 5 touchdowns against Nevada.
its hawaiisashimi, of course it isnt.glockguy wrote:UnBiasFan wrote:Our offense needs very little adjustments.
I expect 5 touchdowns against Nevada.
R u serious?
I already told you I wasn't that person a long time ago. Go back and compare the writing if you have nothing better to do.xer 21 wrote:its hawaiisashimi, of course it isnt.glockguy wrote:UnBiasFan wrote:Our offense needs very little adjustments.
I expect 5 touchdowns against Nevada.
R u serious?
Development of Schoerder = 1-11. If he didn't develop, we would have been 0-12.UnBiasFan wrote:I guess you missed the development of Schroeder (2012 v 2013) because you were so busy hating. Woolsey is due for a break out game and I get to post this opinion like you get to hate (incessantly).
I guess every board has one.UnBiasFan wrote:Our offense needs very little adjustments.
I expect 5 touchdowns against Nevada.
Joey Iosefa was did well at the wildcat despite gaining over 50 lbs from his HS days as a QBPalolo_2LA wrote:When I saw Keelan @ the SDSU game, he looked buff. I am unsure of his throwing ability given his added mass. A wildcat QB has to have the ability to pass or the D will load the box.
However, his return was electric and he pulled away from the defenders as he neared the end zone, so I'm for giving this "gifted" player a chance. We can't get any worse.
Why? Even in high school he wasn't that good of a passer.UHALLDAWAY808 wrote:I think Keelan should at least get a look at QB..maybe a couple practices..Im sure he still throws a ball around when not at practice....if not, get him in there somehow
you know im never going to believe that when your name is "unbiasfan" and his go to catchphrase was "I'm unbias".UnBiasFan wrote:
I already told you I wasn't that person a long time ago. Go back and compare the writing if you have nothing better to do.
I was around back in the day. My old screenname hadn't been used in a long time and I do not know the password anymore. So I re-emerged as UnBiasFan. If we score 6 touchdowns this week, I will reveal my original handle.xer 21 wrote:you know im never going to believe that when your name is "unbiasfan" and his go to catchphrase was "I'm unbias".UnBiasFan wrote:
I already told you I wasn't that person a long time ago. Go back and compare the writing if you have nothing better to do.
Everyone remembers when Schroeder broke out against Fresno State. There is nothing to say that Woolsey doesn't have it in him. (The w-l record may have been bad. But Schroeder was a decent fantasy play in a lot of games).Makana wrote:I know I'm late to the discussion but, NO to the Wildcat period, that formation and plays suck. How about stick with what's working (da heck am I talking about ain't nothing working lol), but stick with run the rock and play good D. That D last weekend was horrible, then again hard to beat the opposing team and the refs they brought with them.
Watching how Schroeder and Woosley play, I don't see Woosley having the same "feel" of the position that Schroeder had to have a "breakout" performance anytime soon.UnBiasFan wrote:Everyone remembers when Schroeder broke out against Fresno State. There is nothing to say that Woolsey doesn't have it in him. (The w-l record may have been bad. But Schroeder was a decent fantasy play in a lot of games).Makana wrote:I know I'm late to the discussion but, NO to the Wildcat period, that formation and plays suck. How about stick with what's working (da heck am I talking about ain't nothing working lol), but stick with run the rock and play good D. That D last weekend was horrible, then again hard to beat the opposing team and the refs they brought with them.