I know, DC. I went to a school in the early '90s that, at the time, was a part of the NAIA....East Central University in Oklahoma. It's now a NCAA Div. II school.dcwarrior wrote:Technically, NAIA is a completely different organization from the NCAA. At one time it was the dominant college sports organization, but a long time ago most of the top schools left to join the less-restrictive NCAA.wyokie wrote:UBC plays football in the NAIA (it's a level below NCAA). They are considering moving up to NCAA Division II.
Future Opponents
-
- *True Sports Fan*
- Posts: 19928
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 7:54 pm
- MLB: Colorado Rockies
- NBA: Denver Nuggets
- NFL: Buffalo Bills
- Location: Oklahoma City via Casper, WYO
- Contact:
Re: Future Opponents
-
- First guy off the bench
- Posts: 340
- Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 6:18 am
- Location: south america
Re: Future Opponents
UH administration remains the primary current and future opponent:
http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootbal ... ocker-room
http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootbal ... ocker-room
Re: Future Opponents
I think the UH/SMU matchup has lost it's luster.
SMU isn't even one of the top offensive teams.
No real incentive in scheduling them from Navy, Georgia Tech, or any other team with former UH coaches.
SMU isn't even one of the top offensive teams.
No real incentive in scheduling them from Navy, Georgia Tech, or any other team with former UH coaches.
Re: Future Opponents
And their offense is based on gimmicks and other stuff that doesn't work in the real world.Optimus wrote:I think the UH/SMU matchup has lost it's luster.
SMU isn't even one of the top offensive teams.
No real incentive in scheduling them from Navy, Georgia Tech, or any other team with former UH coaches.
Unlike our offense, which is a real offense.